I've heard you have to worry more about security with network-attached storage (NAS) vs. storage area network (SAN)....
Why? And, is there anything you can do to ensure NAS security?
NAS is not necessarily less secure than a SAN; NAS security is just done differently. With a SAN, you are getting volumes (or LUNs) served up to operating systems for usage. Those LUNs can have file systems on them or databases or some other direct usage. The security is at the SAN level, controlling the access to the LUN, and at the server operating system (and application) level, controlling the users who have access to the data.
For NAS security, the file system (or file systems) are on the NAS device and the access to the file system and the files within the file system is controlled by the privileges that are assigned (typically called access control lists). If the privileges are set up correctly (either manually or through system control such as Active Directory), users that are not authorized are denied access.
Related Q&A from Randy Kerns
What is the one hidden gotcha that you'd advise users about if they were shopping for an all-flash storage array?continue reading
How much control do you have with all-flash storage arrays? How much control do you have over how arrays handle your data? Do you control the caching?continue reading
Vendors often publish numbers for 'usable' capacity versus 'effective' capacity. Can you explain this and how can you plan flash capacity needs with ...continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.