NAS vs. PC-based file server

Digg This!     StumbleUpon     Del.icio.us

RELATED CONTENT Small-midsized Business NAS Scale Computing develops IBM's GPFS for midmarket scale-out multiprotocol storage Multiprotocol and unified data storage tutorial for SMBs SMB data storage briefs: Thecus Tech Corp. launches new NAS server, the N8800PRO Iomega launches ix2-200 NAS desktop backup appliance with replication and iSCSI support HP expands Microsoft-based SMB network-attached storage offerings with Data Vault series Network-attached storage (NAS) performance issues with SMBs can be avoided with proper planning GreenBytes launches data deduplication for primary and secondary data storage Dell adds entry-level rack mounted Windows-based NAS Iomega launches StorCenter network-attached storage upgrade with Mac support and data replication Cloud network-attached storage (NAS) emerges to address secondary file storage needs

RELATED RESOURCES 2020software.com, trial software downloads for accounting software, ERP software, CRM software and business software systems Search Bitpipe.com for the latest white papers and business webcasts Whatis.com, the online computer dictionary

At a high level, a NAS can be described as a multiprotocol network storage appliance with an operating system optimized for file services. One of the advantages of a NAS over a traditional PC-based file server is that it can also act as a Fibre Channel or iSCSI storage array. This means it can present network share via CIFS or NFS like a PC but also give access to disk storage like disk array via iSCSI or FC. NAS appliances also come with data protection software features such as snapshots and replication.

If an organization already has a central storage array or a storage area network (SAN), it is possible to deploy a NAS gateway as an interface to some of the SAN disk and present it as CIFS or NFS shares. If you do not have or do not plan to implement a SAN but still need central storage capabilities, a NAS appliance is the way to go as it is more scalable than most PC-type file servers. If you only have a requirement to share a small amount of data on the network, a PC-type file server will likely be more cost effective.