Home > Small-midsized Business Data Storage Tips > SMB storage tips > Fibre Channel SAN versus iSCSI SAN: Cost and scalability considerations
SMB Storage Tips:
EMAIL THIS
 TIPS & NEWSLETTERS TOPICS 

SMB STORAGE TIPS

Fibre Channel SAN versus iSCSI SAN: Cost and scalability considerations


Brian Peterson
01.16.2009
Rating: --- (out of 5)


SMB storage technical tips
Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us    Add to Google


In the first part of our series on Fibre Channel and iSCSI storage area networks (SANs) for SMBs, we discussed the reliability and performance of each. In this part, we will discuss the cost and scalability considerations to help you decide which one is best for you.

When all out performance isn't required, ISCSI clearly has a leg up when it comes to holding down cost. iSCSI leverages the knowledgebase of existing IP network administrators, possibly reducing the staff required to support the storage infrastructure. iSCSI also offers the opportunity to reduce the cable count in low I/O situations by routing storage and general IP over the same NIC port.

Keep in mind though, if iSCSI is expected to compete with 4 Gb Fibre Channel performance, 10 GbE network ports dedicated network segments and iSCSI HBAs all cost about the same as their Fibre Channel counterparts. Finally, data storage manufactures understand the cost-conscious SMB marketplace and usually price iSCSI arrays more attractively than similar or larger Fibre Channel arrays.

iSCSI versus Fibre Channel: Which is more scalable?

iSCSI is infinitely more flexible than Fibre Channel. Fibre Channel initiator to target distances are limited by the allowed length of a fiber segment and flat networks. ...


Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us    Add to Google



RELATED CONTENT
Small-midsized Business SAN
Compellent says smaller businesses can dodge forklift upgrades with QuickStart Fibre Channel SAN
Fibre Channel switch options for SMBs
Hewlett-Packard launches first external 6 Gbps Serial-Attached SCSI enclosures
Dell launches EqualLogic PS4000 iSCSI SAN for SMBs
Ten signs you're ready for a storage area network (SAN)
Hewlett-Packard launches Windows 2008-based multiprotocol data storage system for SMBs
Networked data storage for SMBs: Five signs you need to ditch direct-attached storage
Plustek announces new multi-function server for SOHO/SMBs
Storage area network (SAN) options for SMBs
StorMagic goes virtual with iSCSI SAN for VMware

SMB storage tips
Low-cost data storage replication options for SMBs
Data migration strategies and best practices
Five must-have data storage security tools for smaller businesses
Data reduction strategies for SMBs
Data migration strategies for multivendor storage systems
Optimizing RAID data storage for your business
Data backup and recovery choices for SMBs
Virtual desktop infrastructure deployments: The pros and cons of VDI
Data storage for virtual environments: Pros and cons of DAS, NAS and SAN
The state of RAID data protection in enterprise storage today

RELATED RESOURCES
2020software.com, trial software downloads for accounting software, ERP software, CRM software and business software systems
Search Bitpipe.com for the latest white papers and business webcasts
Whatis.com, the online computer dictionary


Because iSCSI relies on TCP/IP, which happens to power the global internet, distances are only limited by an application's tolerance for latency. iSCSI is also more flexible because it rides on the very open and resilient TCP/IP standard. As a result, iSCSI initiators, networks and targets have far fewer interoperability challenges than Fibre Channel.

Both iSCSI and Fibre Channel are viable technologies and there is considerable overlap in their sweet spots. Fibre Channel has proven to be reliable, scalable and fast while iSCSI deploys quickly with extreme flexibility at a relatively low cost point.

This chart will help you determine which protocol is best for your organization. Select three of the five characteristics that are most important and count the number of wins for each protocol. The one with the highest score is probably the best choice.

About the author: Brian Peterson is an independent IT infrastructure analyst. He has a deep background in enterprise storage and open-systems computing platforms. He has consulted with hundreds of enterprise customers who struggled with the challenges of disaster recovery, scalability, technology refreshes and controlling costs.

Do you have comments on this tip? Let us know. Please let others know how useful this tip was via the rating scale below.

Do you know a helpful storage tip, timesaver or workaround? Email the editors to talk about writing for SearchSMBStorage.com.

Rate this Tip
To rate tips, you must be a member of SearchSMBStorage.com.
Register now to start rating these tips. Log in if you are already a member.




DISCLAIMER: Our Tips Exchange is a forum for you to share technical advice and expertise with your peers and to learn from other enterprise IT professionals. TechTarget provides the infrastructure to facilitate this sharing of information. However, we cannot guarantee the accuracy or validity of the material submitted. You agree that your use of the Ask The Expert services and your reliance on any questions, answers, information or other materials received through this Web site is at your own risk.



SMB Solutions - SAN Consolidation
About Us  |  Contact Us  |  For Advertisers  |  For Business Partners  |  Site Index  |  RSS
SEARCH 
TechTarget provides technology professionals with the information they need to perform their jobs - from developing strategy, to making cost-effective purchase decisions and managing their organizations' technology projects - with its network of technology-specific websites, events and online magazines.

TechTarget Corporate Web Site  |  Media Kits  |  Site Map




All Rights Reserved, Copyright 2008 - 2009, TechTarget | Read our Privacy Policy
  TechTarget - The IT Media ROI Experts